气体扩散层受压缩对液态水传输和微结构的影响[设计因素其十三]

电化学能源科学与技术 2022-06-22

news

1006 字丨阅读本文需 9 分钟

气体扩散层受压缩对液态水传输和微结构的影响[设计因素其十三]

Effect of compression on liquid watertransport and microstructure of PEMFC gas diffusion layers

A. Bazylak

D. Sinton

Z.-S. Liu

N. Djilali

Abstract

This work explores how the degradation ofthe gas diffusion layer (GDL) under compression contributes to the formation of preferential pathways forwater transport. Fluorescencemicroscopy is used to provide ex situ visualization of liquid water transport throughthe GDL placed beneath an optically transparent clamping plate. Transientimage data obtained with a CCD camera indicates that areas of compression inthe GDL coincide with preferential pathways for water transport andbreak-through. Preferential flow ofwater through the smaller pores resulting from GDL compression is contrary tothe expected behaviour in a hydrophobic medium, and this suggests a loss of hydrophobicity. Scanningelectron microscopy (SEM) is used to investigate the effect of compression onthe morphology of the GDL. These SEM images show that compressing the GDL causes the breakup of fibers and, indeed,deterioration of the hydrophobic coating.

Fig. 1. Schematic of fluorescence  microscopy and GDL clamping apparatus.

Table 1 Liquid breakthrough pressures

Fig. 2. Digital images from fluorescence  microscopy showing the evolution of water transport at (a) t=4.9s, (b)  t=5.2s, and (c) t=6.5s. Images to the left have been inverted for clarity,  with the areas compressed by the O-ring shown as the area between the  concentric dashed circles. To the right of each image is the three-dimensional  rendering of the signal intensity.

Fig.3. Inverted fluorescence image at 5.2  s showing flow paths 1 and 2 shown in Fig. 4. The areas of the GDL that are  compressed exist between the concentric dashed circles.

Fig. 4. The liquid water surface height determined  via correlation with fluorescence intensity of paths 1 and 2, where path 1 appears  in the uncompressed GDL and path 2 appears in the compressed GDL.

A programmable syringe-pump (Harvard  Apparatus PHD 22/2000) was used to deliver the fluorescein dye via Teflon FEP  tubing (Upchurch Scientific, WA) from the syringe pump to the GDL at a rate  of 0.02mlmin −1 .

Fig. 5. Inverted fluorescence images  showing the liquid water breakthrough location with respect to the  compression O-ring, where all trials except for trials 3 and 5 resulted in  breakthrough originating in the area above the compression O-ring. Red arrows  indicate where breakthrough coincided with the compression region. The blue  arrows indicate where excess fluid excited through the outlet hole,  post-breakthrough.

Fig. 6. SEM images of a Toray TGP-H-060  GDL with 10% PTFE treatment before compression at (a) 200× magnification with  a hand-held 1cm×1cm sample (inset), (b) 800× magnification, and (c) enlarged  image of (b) at 4000× magnification.

The Toray TGP-H-060 GDL is also a highly  porous media with more than 50% of its pore sizes ranging from 30 to 40um,  with a thickness of 190um, and a mean fiber diameter of 8um.

Fig.7. SEM image of a Toray TGP-H-060 GDL  with 10% PTFE treatment after it was compressed for 5min at 0.18MPa at 1000×  magnification with a 10kV beam voltage showing the damaged PTFE coating.

Fig. 8. SEM images of the GDL at 200x  magnification after it has been compressed for five minutes at (a) 0.18MPa,  (b) 0.36MPa, (c) 0.68MPa, and (d) 1.37MPa.

Conclusion

Compressing a PEMFC GDL has a large  influence on liquid water transport behaviour as well as on the GDL  microstructure morphology.Fluorescence microscopy was applied to provide ex situ  visualizations, showing that the compressed GDL provides preferential  pathways for water transport and breakthrough. SEM images clearly illustrating  the degradation of the GDL under varying compression pressures were  presented. The irreversible damage at  the surface of the GDL consists of fiber and PTFE coating breakage and  deformation, which locally produce greater proportions of hydrophillic to  hydrophobic surface area. Preferential pathways for water transport are a result of these localized  hydrophillic pathways in the bulk hydrophobic  GDL. The present work shows that compression alters liquid water transport and favors flow in the compressed areas of the GDL (under the land area)  due to both morphological changes  and possible loss of hydrophobicity. With respect to fuel cell operation, this liquid water transport behaviour may be beneficial as water can be  channeled to where transport is less  critical. Liquid water transport in  the fuel cell could be further controlled by pre-compressing the material in  strategic locations to facilitate removal of excess water in the assembled cell.

虽然是十五年前的一篇文献,但是实验仍然很新颖,不禁让我思考:

如果将疏水的气体扩散层进行预先压缩,是否影响气体扩散层的接触角?

再在O圈下进行液态水传输实验,是否通道1和通道2之间的差异会变小?

在不同温度条件下进行液态水传输实验会是什么结果?

气体扩散层中的液态水不是100%,对实测出来的液态厚度的结果有影响么?是累积总厚度还是包含了空隙的总厚度?

猜你喜欢:

燃料电池设计因素

燃料电池电解质膜的应力状态与设计因素:边框边界位置、密封件高度、边框和密封材料(设计因素其一)

燃料电池电堆活性区接触应力分布的影响因素:端板厚度、端板材料、密封模型、密封件硬度、电池节数、电池位置(设计因素其二)

燃料电池电堆内部应力分布的模拟和压敏纸测量:介电材料和边框材料的应用、膜干湿对应力的影响[设计因素其三]

纤维基材料受压下三维微结构模拟:气体扩散层在脊部和流道内部的变化[设计因素其四]

燃料电池双极板流道参数的设计:以田口方法和es-pemfc联合优化直流道为例[设计因素其五]

燃料电池气体扩散层弯曲刚度各向异性对性能的影响:弯曲刚度、性能、HFR、流阻、厚度的差异分析[设计因素其六]

燃料电池气体扩散层的可压缩性:基材中PTFE含量、MPL中PTFE及含量、气体扩散层和密封复合、试验机刚度的影响[设计因素其六]

同时测量压缩压强、压缩位移、欧姆电阻评估气体扩散层的电阻、厚度、稳态和局部破坏[材料对标其四,设计因素其八]
金属双极板燃料电池的装配扭矩对气体扩散层局部受压破坏、气密性和电化学性能的影响[设计因素其九]

四参数(流道脊部宽度、拔模角、圆角、压缩压强)模型评估计算金属双极板流道和气体扩散层受压下的变形和流阻增加现象[设计因素其十]

气体扩散层和无流道双极板材料接触电阻的测量和自相似结构函数法预测[设计因素其十一]

燃料电池端板设计和生产验证实践:由接触电阻判和传质阻抗确定端板变形量、厚度优化[设计因素其十二]

燃料电池膜电极边框位置应力分析:气体扩散层-边框间隙配合和氢空压差

分配区点状结构对大面积燃料电池电流密度分布均一性、温度分布的影响

免责声明:凡注明来源本网的所有作品,均为本网合法拥有版权或有权使用的作品,欢迎转载,注明出处本网。非本网作品均来自其他媒体,转载目的在于传递更多信息,并不代表本网赞同其观点和对其真实性负责。如您发现有任何侵权内容,请依照下方联系方式进行沟通,我们将第一时间进行处理。

0赞 好资讯,需要你的鼓励
来自:电化学能源科学与技术
0

参与评论

登录后参与讨论 0/1000

为你推荐

加载中...